Affect what is it good for

Save Word. Definition of affect Entry 1 of 3. Hall The eruption of Krakatau in what is now Indonesia affected global sunsets for years … — Evelyn Browning Garriss Before the s it was not at all clear how nicotine affected the brain. Lee Kagan. Definition of affect Entry 2 of 3. Bond : to be given to a preferred style of dress, speech, etc. Definition of affect Entry 3 of 3. Baumeister and Brad J. Bushman Killing and meaningless mass murder without affect , as the psychologists say, … have become too frequent occurrences in contemporary life.

Synonyms for affect Synonyms: Verb 2 impact , impress , influence , move , reach , strike , sway , tell on , touch Synonyms: Noun act , assume , bluff , counterfeit , dissemble , fake , feign , pass for , pretend , profess , put on , sham , simulate Visit the Thesaurus for More. Choose the Right Synonym for affect Verb 1 affect , influence , touch , impress , strike , sway mean to produce or have an effect upon. Frequently Asked Questions About affect What is the difference between affect and effect?

What is the difference between affection and affectation? Examples of affect in a Sentence Verb 1 As strange as this sounds, the negative karma probably affected the actual games, the way a gambler who constantly dwells on his bad luck can derail an entire blackjack table. Determine if the usage calls for a verb or a noun. You can affect an effect but you shouldn't effect an affect — that's acting.

But they have no senses in common. Both words can be used as either nouns or verbs, so that's not a foolproof distinction. Its use as a noun by a journalist is an affectation.

The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press. Maffesoli, Michel. The Time of the Tribes , London: Sage.

Tarde, Gabriel. The Laws of Imitation. New York: Henry Holt. Warner, Michael. Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Barthes, Roland. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:. Massumi characterizes It callsintb questionthe categorialcoherence of modesof social affect as a domain of intensity,indeterminacy,and above all po inq"itv.

Thc theindividual t. This is whv portrt-. Emotion is qualifiedintensity,the conven- for:example,an anthropologrof emotion,or of aestheticsystems tional, consensualpoint of insertion of intensity into semantic- that would seekto eiplain affectby situatingit comparatively ally and semioticallyformed progressions,into narrativizable within integratedculturalorders' action-reactioncircuits,into function and meaning.

It is inten- SeenthiJ way,conventionalsocialanalysisis alwaysarriving sity owned and recognized Massumi Thescholarly systemand in our freshbeforeit appearsin our consciousness. The ri. Further,,The ive,romanticallyraw domainof primitiveexperientialrichness' word. The senses, Q6OZ I think he shouldbe takenat his trace determinesa tendency,the potential,if not yet the appetite, ute tne self,havetheir histories.

But Massumi's work, like so f9r. As he puts it irr and the early l9th-century the normativeforms of Europeansov- a moment of rhetorical exaltation: ,If there were no escape,no ereignty shifted from spectaculartheatricality to rationalized, excessor remainder,no fade-out to infinity, the universewould affeit-evacuatedtechnicism.

Even G. F' the possibilitythat the 'thing' it describesmay help us to reihink Hegel'sall-absorbingSpirit found someinspiration in 17th-century the politics of public culture in a productiveiy criiical way. But such infantile dallianceswith 'superstition' had to be disowned for grown- affect-intensive TheClanandthe Crowd. Modernity andAffect up modernity to take its soberscientificform. For their part, cri- tical theorists of modernity from Karl Marx onward transform the The just-so story we too often tell ourselvesabout the origins Romantic lament for lost aestheticfullnessinto a systemicpolemic of modernity takes disenchantmentas its central theme.

The inevitableend point abstractions of modern knowledge by the vitally embodied is Max weber's 'iron cage,'an arrogantly soullessbureauiratic energiesthey both require and deny. From the psychoanalytic 'nullity' ruled by'specialists without spirit, sensualistswithout liberition theologr of a Herbert Marcuse or a Wilhelm Reich to heart' [] Political legitimationalso,it seems,has taken the samecourse, On this point, conservativeindividualists ioin hands with rad- Jiirgen Habermas [] narrates the transition from a ical populists, enabling Jos6Ortega y Gasset'sremark, made in spectacular'publicnessof representation'in which the bodv of the 'The past has reason the s,to enact its own prophesytoday: sovereign,ritually emerginginto public view, assertedand con- on its side, its own reason.

If that reason is not admitted, it will firm. Gustave Le Bon: of de- the disavowal through which the discourseof modernity absolverl sentimentand acf is contagious' [] Composed itself from grappling with its own affectivepolitics.

The end resu'it,famously, is a'collective hallucination' that in today'spolarizedtheoreticallandscapehasbecomealmost liOl,l masscognitivemeltdown that,invadesthe understanding unimaginable: a social theory that is at once semiologicalanrl critical faculty' 18 ' Thus savagesolidarity "nd'pututyres"all judgment, but also affect-based. The Polynesiancategory ol relationships not only required a psychically problemati.

But in stressingits volatile ,con- inii, tgeg I but were also quite cfgarlyincompatible work tagiousnesslits amoral energy,Durkheim is also invoking the.

In the discourseof modernity, affect appearsas a socialphar- Tarde"moved from this diagnosisof the affectively conductive urban crowd to a striking formula for social lif. In 'society is imita- condition ofmimetic resonance: the Durkheimian bounded clan, the harnessingof mana for pur- leneralized "tion posesof socialregenerationis a noisy,sweatybut relativelymech.

But the organic complexity of industrial societies emphasis. The figure of the urban mob when cial iorm oi -urs society,is either inert or hyperactive'In eith. But in the open crowd thesevery same tt. Crowd agitation readsas emergentpuissance unreason now reappearsas the productive, 'The mass man has no regressive,driven by atavistic instincts at odds with the brittle of ttt" multitude. Ortega y Gassetwrote bonds of civilization. William Mazzarella Affect:Whatis it Goodfor? Elias Canetti capturesthis paradoxicalpursuit in order to be effeitive - i.

Without suchritual retardation,the crowd acceler as to make them appearto be mu- ates inexorably towards orgasmic conflagration,the ,discharge ' ptu".

In the houseof or- in the pragmatics of insti oti"iiti-ution. Rather,one seet it too ganizedreligion, conversely,'whatever the church has to show, is demands seek tutloliuf practice, where abstract institutional shownslowly' [],originalemphasis. And Michel reach for legalistic affective resonance and affective appeals Maffesoli notes,somewhat over-generally:'Any effervescenceis structurallyfoundational. But 'gap' is a condition of power's efficacy'if by ef- The languageof ritual is the languageof power, insofar as it the contrary, this engage- enshrines the dramaturgical conventions of state nationalism ficacy we mean itsiapacity to harnessour attention' our it might appearthat a.